Is it Appropriate for Educators to Critique Their Government and Political Leaders?
As I was reading a book written by Nel Noddings “Philosophy of Education” I came across an interesting question that challenged my thinking:
“Is it Appropriate for Educators to Critique Their Government and Political Leaders?”
My perspective:
I firmly believe that it is essential for teachers to voice their opinions, including criticisms of their government and leaders. Criticism, though often perceived negatively, has the potential to be constructive, transformative, and affirming. While every critique may be driven by an underlying motive, most are aimed at fostering improvement.
Expecting the government to be exempt from critique, especially on matters impacting society and its citizens, is unrealistic. Teachers, as integral members of the workforce, have responsibilities and rights:
- They should speak up against substandard working conditions.
- They must raise their voice when necessary resources are lacking.
- They have the right to express concern if the curriculum fails to meet societal needs
- Their involvement in curriculum development is crucial, and their opinions should not be suppressed.
- Their grievances deserve attention until adequately addressed.
- Advocating for their students' rights is a responsibility they should not shy away from.
Paulo Freire's insights in "Pedagogy of the Oppressed," a book that influenced me. Freire asserts, “Leaders who do not act dialogically but insist on imposing their decisions, do not organize the people--they manipulate them. They do not liberate, nor are they liberated: they oppress.”
Such oppression is blatant. The government and its leaders must address not only the visible issues that receive public criticism but also the underlying problems that remain unseen by many. My critique comes from a place of genuine concern and a desire for positive change.
Written By Oliver Kasito Jnr
Comments
Post a Comment